black: of color pure and true
(dedicated to mi pana, pedro
pietri,
and inspired by the late malcolm x,
who taught me to
read that dictionary
and to use those foreign words)
according to those cunning custodians
of webster’s wicked
wishes
that which can best describe our kind
is: “black”
but
a petty middle english adjective
perhaps borrowed from the old
english “blaec”
and akin to an old high german word “blah”
that
which comes from the latin “flagare”
(which is “to
burn”)
and the greek “phlegein”
that which has
been used
to decipher and debase us
since before the 12th century
truly does us no justice
and those who are “very dark in
color”
and/or gifted with even one droplet
of said ancestral
melanin and might
can never allow themselves to be defined
and
denied by the recalcitrant curators
of the delusions of dweams
for if those of such obtuse vision
can only see “black” as:
“having
a very deep or low register“
"very sad, gloomy, or calamitous“
"dirty,
or soiled”
“thoroughly sinister or evil“
"indicative of condemnation
or discredit“
"characterized by hostility or angry discontent”
(well,
I don’t know about that one)
“marked by the occurrence
of disaster”
as in: black sheep
(see also:
blacklist. blackout, and blackmail
or is it black male?)
and as “the achromatic color of least lightness”
then
they are damned to ruin
by such fell blindness
for those who are “very
dark in color”
and/or gifted with even one droplet
of said
ancestral melanin and might
have historically enjoyed and emitted
more spirit, character, felicity,
virtue, wisdom, and energy
than
those cunning custodians
of webster’s wicked wishes
could
ever aspire to capture and enslave
and, if may borrow another word,
or two
from the truly departed webster
what, after all, is white
and light
and, hence, “right”
if not the opposite
of all that is pure, and black, and true?
© 1994 by Marina
Ortiz
(¿te gusta? pues toma más) |